Exploring Cognitive Behavior Theory And Therapy - 897 Words

Exploring Cognitive Behavior Theory and Therapy From the time of the advent of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory and therapy until now, psychologists have searched for new and better ways to both understand and treat the human psyche. Many psychologists have spent their lives analyzing the complexities of human thought, behavior, and interactions with societal influences in order to find new ways to guide humans towards a more fulfilling human experience. Throughout time, various theories and models of therapy have emerged, each with their strengths and weaknesses in their efforts to help humanity live more fulfilling lives. Psychoanalytic, Adlerian, existential, person-centered, gestalt, behavior, cognitive, cognitive behavior (CBT), reality, feminist, postmodern, and family systems approaches have all made important contributions towards the evolution of psychological theory and therapy. One of the most widely accepted and practiced forms of theory and therapy in today’s world of psychology is CBT. Cognitive-Be havior Therapy has a rich and storied history, contains more inherent strengths than weaknesses, and provides effective treatment for a variety of psychological conditions. History of Theory According to Thoma, Pilecki, and McKay (2015), CBT is a result of the evolution and the intertwining of cognitive therapy and behavior therapy. Many of the early behavior theories and therapy techniques are combine with cognitive theories and techniques to form CBTShow MoreRelatedCognitive Therapy for Depression1317 Words   |  6 PagesCognitive Therapy for Depression Cognitive Therapy also known as (CT) is a form of psychotherapy that was developed by the psychiatrist Aaron T. Beck. This style of therapy is one that can change the unrealistic views and way of thinking of the client. This paper will discuss Cognitive Therapy for Depression on children, adults, the evidence that supports CT, and the disadvantages and advantages of CT. This paper will also discuss on how certain life experiences can cause psychological distressRead MoreDefinition Of Person Centered Therapy1202 Words   |  5 Pages Person-Centered Theory Kebeh Beyan Walden University Person-centered therapy can be understood as a form of counseling and psychotherapy which puts a particular emphasis on conceptualizing and engaging with people in a deeply valuing and respectful way (Cooper McLeod, 2011). It was also mentioned that Person-centered therapy aims to provide clients with a set of therapeutic conditions in which they can reconnect with their actual, individual experiences and valuing processes, movingRead MoreThe Importance Of Clinical Psychology Within The Correctional Setting1285 Words   |  6 Pagesfurther harm by the individual. In the best-case scenario, the interaction between therapy and the law will lead to a rehabilitation of the offender, help her change her maladaptive behavior, and give her the tools to deal with problems in the future. However, women experience many barriers after being released, such as being treated as outcasts, an inability to find employment, being judged for their criminal behavior, and experiencing shame (Dodge P ogrebin, 2001). This shame is exacerbated forRead MoreTheoretical Orientation At Your Field Placement959 Words   |  4 Pagesbecause it is more structured and goal oriented. We will serve clients of different cultures and norms, backgrounds and environments. Theoretical orientations are just as diverse as our clients which allows us a broader spectrum of counseling and therapy for intentional and effective service. In this paper the writer will discuss how to develop a theoretical orientation, how to explore your theoretical orientation, how to integrate your theoretical orientation at your field placement and in conclusionRead MoreA Reflective And Competent Practitioner Essay1292 Words   |  6 PagesIn my journey to become a reflective and competent practitioner, the approach to counseling theory, which I espouse, will play an integral role in my development as a counselor. It will define the techniques I employ, how I develop and view the therapeutic relationship, how involve d I will be in client’s goal setting and change process, as well as, my view of human nature. I fully comprehend that as I progress in my career, my approach may alter and adjust as I actively work with clients and utilizeRead MoreContrasting Psycodynamic, Cognitive Behavioral and Person-Centered Counseling Theories1732 Words   |  7 Pages2005). Counseling theories are used by counselors as part of their treatment plan for clients. There are many types of theories that counselors can choose from. These theories are usually hosen based on the client needs and what the counselor feel will be most effective. Counselors are not limited to just one theory when it comes to treating their clients. Theories can be used in conjunction with one another to effectively treat clients. Counseling does not just involve theories alone, it in involvesRead MoreEssay about Group Therapy Theory Comparison1475 Words   |  6 Pagestherapists may often begin to consider leading a group therapy session. Group therapy is a form of therapy in which a therapist either treats or provides psychoeducational skills to a small, carefully planned target group of individuals in an effort to ameliorate the issues and dysfunctions of each individual in that particular group of patients together (Scheidlinger, 2004). In this group, therapists often utilize some of the psychotherapy theories such as Gestalt, transactional analysis, psychotherapyRead MoreCase Study : Client Mental Health Characteristics Essay1617 Words   |  7 PagesCase Study: Client Mental Health Characteristics During the initial phase of therapy, Jane exhibited characteristics that I considered mentally unhealthy in CBT. She had little insight into her maladaptive information processing; she could identify that she was anxious, but was unable to trace the source of this anxiety. I identified two types of cognitive distortions that were problematic for the client: arbitrary inference and mislabeling. Arbitrary inference became particularly obvious asRead MoreCase Study : Wedge Recovery Center1202 Words   |  5 Pageshours addiction groups per week, along conducting 15-20 individual sessions per week, which includes assisting the individuals with developing their treatment plan. Cognitive Behavior Therapy is the primary methodology Wedge institute, where I also include the Systems method toward treatment, mainly the sub-systems aspect of the theory to assist the individuals with addressing their environment and how it impact their progress toward regaining their life. To address the objective of this paperRead MoreCognitive Behavioral Therapy Essay example1507 Words   |  7 PagesCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is among the most extensively tested psychotherapies for depression. Many studies have confirmed the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as a treatment for depression. This paper will provide background information about the intervention, address the target population, and describe program structure and key components. It will also provide examples of program implementation, challenges/barriers to implementing the practice, address how the practice supports

Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay Free Essays

string(164) " A very concerning concept is that a vast majority of the groups that are fighting to keep the ban on gay marriage, are traditionalists and religious based groups\." When taken at face value, many Americans would not think that forbidding gay couples to marry affects them. What many fail to recognize is that these kinds of discriminatory laws reach out and touch every life in this country. For a nation to intentionally and blatantly tell one group of people that they are not entitled to the same rights and protections as other groups of people sheds a dark shadow on the rest of the nation. We will write a custom essay sample on Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now If the government can interfere so wholeheartedly into the lives of those it is supposed to serve, then none of us are safe. Very few people actually understand why gay marriage is an issue. The overwhelming trends of â€Å"changing values†, abandoning religion, and the adaptation of new lifestyles have brought this issue to the forefront. So, if everyone is so against gay â€Å"marriage†, the nation needs to extend the rights of marriage to gays, even if it means that it needs to be done under a different title. The Legislative Branch is responsible for making the laws which govern the country. It is never possible to please all of the people, but fairness is always an option. While the traditionalists and religious majority are claiming that â€Å"Marriage is a holy union between a man and a women with vows taken before god† (â€Å"Same Sex Marriage? â€Å"); the government needs to find a position somewhere in the middle of protecting the traditional marriage, and allowing for equal rights and protections for all of its citizens. When the government stepped in and became a part of â€Å"marriage†, they essentially needed to remove the religious aspects of it in order to adhere to the long standing policy of â€Å"separation of church and state†. This was never done, and because it was never a problem, it has remained a government/religious union that many felt the need to protect because of the religious attachments. Well, it is a problem now. There are hundreds of thousands of American citizens being denied rights and protections because while they are a strong and powerful part of our population, they are still heavily outnumbered by the religious majority seeking to protect the institution of marriage. To see what must be done by the legislature to right the wrongs done by anti-gay legislation, one must understand the history of this battle and the causes for the recent influx of gay marriage supporters. This battle has been raging since the 1970’s when gay individuals first started questioning why they were not allowed to get married. At that time, most reasoned that they (gays) would just go away, that they were just looking to have the wedding, but cared little about actually being married. No one could have guessed that forty years later, the â€Å"gay† population would be doubled in size, the American idea of the â€Å"traditional family† would be drastically changed, the religious majority would be experience a major power shift, and that our supreme court would be hearing these cases on a regular basis. If one were to ask the opponents of gay marriage how we got to where we are today, they would likely respond with some kind of comment regarding the demise of the traditional family, or how integrative teaching has changed the expectations of marriage (Sharp 71). Those with a more liberal view may state that, throughout the years, science has opened the eyes of many to be more understanding of homosexuality and may therefore link it to a better tolerance for progressive ideas towards gay marriage (Bornman 30-33). The increase in the size of the â€Å"gay community† has made this an issue that must be addressed. In the 1970’s when the gay marriage debate began, it was fueled mainly by gay males, and lesbian females only. Since then, the â€Å"gay community† has increased to include gay men, lesbian women, bisexual men and women, and the transgendered community. The additions of these groups to the supporters of gay marriage, has called for a numbers increase of great magnitude. An example of this increase can be shown based on statistical data (still widely viewed as an estimate only) obtained by the Williams Institute at the UCLA school of law; in 2011 there 9 million (3. 5% of the population) that identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Transgender. When this number is broken down, it is reported that only 1. 7% of this 3. 5% are identified as gay men or lesbian women (Gates 1). That is less than half of the people. This increase has led to stronger lobbying and more strength in numbers. The legislature cannot simply ignore the needs and wants of 3. 5% of the American population. Another significant cause of this increase in support for gay marriage can only be described in â€Å"the changing times†. (Sharp 71) History has shown that conservative attitudes have changed dramatically throughout the years. Just looking at the basic ways of life for example can attest to the change in attitudes. In the 1950’s life was centered around the family. The wife stayed home, cooked, cleaned, and tended to the children. There were various images of the â€Å"perfect housewife† plastered all over the media- a smiling perfectly kept woman waiting at the door wearing an apron and holding a steaming hot turkey on a platter all while kissing her husband as he walks through the door from a hard day’s work. That was the image of the family that was portrayed and lived. Divorce was rare and those leading any lifestyle other than the mainstream norm, were frowned upon and shunned from communities. Obviously this is not the picture of life today. More mothers are working outside of the home. The term â€Å"latchkey kids† is now the norm. Divorce rates are at an all-time high, with single mothers never having been married to their children’s fathers being considered normal. Obviously the American opinion of family and normal has changed, thus changing the opinions of who can be a normal family as well. A very concerning concept is that a vast majority of the groups that are fighting to keep the ban on gay marriage, are traditionalists and religious based groups. You read "Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay" in category "Papers" (â€Å"Same Sex Marriage?†) As a country founded to escape religious persecution, it is highly concerning that in 2011, the opinions of the religious majority are still governing our nation. According to the U. S. Census Bureau, the percentage of the population identifying as â€Å"Christian, Catholic, Baptist, or Protestant† (the four largest religious groups in the nation) has declined from 86% in 1990, to 76% in 2008 (U. S. Census 2011 61). In addition to this, the percentages identifying as â€Å"No religion, Atheist, or Agnostic† increased from 8% in 1990, to 15% in 2008 (U. S. Census 2011 61). It can be speculated that based on the above mentioned â€Å"rule by the religious majority†, that the decline in religious individuals in America, coupled with the rise of those claiming to carry no religious beliefs, has helped the trend of supporters for gay marriage increase. An important fact that needs to be established is that gay marriage is not illegal. Each individual state has the right to create laws to govern their people. Throughout the years as couples attempted to secure marriage licenses that would recognize their same sex partnerships, states began passing statutes that define marriage as a union between man and woman. Some states determined long ago that it was wrong to discriminate and therefore, they should allow gays to be married. (â€Å"National Conference of State Legislatures†) Other states have given the title â€Å"domestic partnership† or â€Å"civil union† to the union between same sex couples. This will allow them to be placed on the same insurance policies and even in some cases file state taxes together, but little other benefits are afforded to these types of unions, and the big question is â€Å"why are these unions allowed but only under a different title? †. This calls to question the obvious. Why are the gays fighting for marriage? Some states recognize it, so they can just go there and get married (or participate in a civil union ceremony) then go home to their states and live their lives. It makes sense in theory but the big problem is that while these states have taken the steps to allow equal protections to all of their citizens, the federal government refuses to recognize these marriages- essentially rendering them invalid. It is because of this, that the solution must lie in the hands of the Federal Government, if they do not make the change, then any change made will be insignificant and superficial at best. In 1993 the Hawaiian Supreme Court ruled that denying marriage to same sex couples was unconstitutional. Uproar spread throughout the country as fear grew that this ruling would open the floodgates allowing gay marriage to be legal everywhere. As a precautionary move, in 1996 President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act into legislation. This put a federal ban on gay marriage, and is really where the battle begins. (â€Å"National Conference of State Legislatures†) In 2009 at the 111th congress, a bill was entered as a proposal to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. This act was called the Respect for Marriage Act. After some bureaucratic push and pull, in March 2011, this act was signed into legislation- officially ending the government’s long standing ban on state recognized same sex marriage. (â€Å"National Conference of State Legislatures†) While this act does not directly legalize or recognize gay marriage at the federal level, it does take away the only standing legal defense that federal courts were able to use in the many cases waged to allow gay couples to have the same rights as heterosexual couples. It is a move in the right direction for lawmakers to finally end the decades long discrimination of gay individuals and couples. While the apparent causes for the influx in gay marriage support is obvious, those not involved in the battle should understand why it is an issue that needs to be solved. Marriage is not only a union made between two people, but it comes with several rights and â€Å"rewards† that are afforded only to married couples. There is the obvious tax break that is available to those filing â€Å"Married† on their federal income tax returns. The amount of money varies greatly depending on income, but it is a financial break nonetheless. There is also the issue of insurance, both health and life. While most states allow those in â€Å"domestic partnerships† to be placed on each other’s insurance, this is not guaranteed by all states and in all circumstances. This means that a gay couple cannot be on each other’s insurance. There are also issues of parenting and adoption. Each state has a different variety of laws, though some do not allow those not married to become adoptive parents. A very large and concerning issue is that of Social Security Survivor Benefits. If a man or woman works all of their lives and pays into the Social Security system and then dies, the money is left to no one because the Federal Government refuses to accept the legal marriages performed in individual states. (â€Å"Center For American Progress†) According to the Center for American Progress, there is a total of â€Å"1,138 federal statutory provisions classified to the United States Code in which marital status is a factor in determining or receiving benefits, rights, and privileges.† (â€Å"Center For American Progress†) That is a total of 1,138 rights and benefits that require a legal marriage to be considered; which is also a total of 1,138 rights and benefits currently being denied to American citizens. The effects are obviously endless, and the solution should be obvious. To properly come up with a solution to this problem, the government must look at the opinions of the majority, coupled with the rights of the minority and find a happy medium. If the government removed all ties to the term â€Å"marriage†, it would then be enabling the religious majority to continue protecting the â€Å"holy union† they so desperately feel the need to protect. This solution would require very little funding, or extreme measures, rather would just take some tricky new wording of the laws to cast a new shadow of fairness upon the nation. This idea makes plenty of sense when you break it down. In order for any man and women to legally be married, they must go to the clerk of court for their locality, and obtain a marriage license. This marriage license is a legal document signed by an employee of a government agency, therefore making marriage a government institution instead of a religious one. There is no currently no requirement that makes it mandatory to get married in a church, or by a member of a church, which goes to reason that a couple can be married without their union being religious. So the government must then decide, do we strip the traditionalists and religious groups of their â€Å"holy union† and create an uproar which will no doubt further clog the courts with cases seeking a repeal? Or should we remove our ties to this union and create our own union that is available to all citizens and would therefore afford them all of the protections and benefits of being â€Å"married†. When it is put this way, the answer is obvious. The federal government can rearrange the terminology of the laws in place today and replace all of the use of the term â€Å"marriage† with a new term. It could be â€Å"civil union† for example. This would, in turn, allow all men and women in the United States to enter into this type of union, and be protected by all laws that â€Å"marriage† currently affords to those married. The traditionalists and religious individuals that want to desperately protect the â€Å"sanctity of marriage† can still do so without having any infringement on their religious beliefs. They can still participate in marriage ceremonies but instead of picking up a â€Å"marriage license† they would need to also obtain a â€Å"civil union license† in order to have their marriage protected by the government. While this idea may put most of the opposition at bay by allowing them to keep their â€Å"marriage†, others who were not previously opposed to gay marriage might consider it too much of a change. For a country that has been â€Å"getting married† for hundreds of years, it is unreasonable to expect all of the people to suddenly change their way of thinking. To start having â€Å"civil union planners† instead of â€Å"wedding planners†, for example, is just asking too much of the people. The government must then ask the people, â€Å"is asking the American people to change their normal ways of thinking to allow for their fellow men and women to be treated fairly under the law really asking too much? † When it is a matter of something being too hard, or too much change; individual rights and freedoms should always come first. Our constitution was drafted in such a way to allow for future leaders to change or amend it as the changing needs of the nation are being met. There was a time when women were not allowed to vote. It had to be a big change for the people to suddenly change everything into such a way that would allow women to vote. There were times when whites were allowed to keep segregated from blacks and to deny blacks the use of public institutions. Laws were written to change these practices as well. People fought and died over the implementation of this new legislation, but it was put in place nonetheless. The government has asked a lot more of the people in regards to changing popular ways of thinking, and all was done in the name of equality. In 2011 this should be an easy task to accomplish. As stated earlier in this essay, times have changed, views are more liberal. Yes it will be an adjustment, but it will be one that will benefit all people eventually. The ideas as to why gay marriage has now become an issue in the forefront of American politics are endless. The effects of the constant denial of rights to American citizen are obvious and in devastating numbers. There is a plausible solution to the problem that will protect not only the wants, but the needs of several different groups of citizens. The resolution of those against it is so strong, as is that of those that carry favorable beliefs. The government has taken steps- both large and small to afford more protections to more people, but it hasn’t been enough. There needs to be new laws written, ones that can allow for all people to feel as though they are American and deserve American freedom. Studies have been done, research compiled, statistics published, and only one answer has been derived. Gay marriage is an issue, and it will not go away. How to cite Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay, Essays

Cloning 9 Essay Research Paper Cloning has free essay sample

Cloning 9 Essay, Research Paper Cloning has been in being in society for many old ages, but it is merely since the twelvemonth of 1997 that the subject of cloning has sparked a contention of positive and negative sentiments. It was in the twelvemonth of 1997 that the first cloning of an animate being had been performed. This sheep # 8217 ; s name was Dolly and Dolly created a craze within the scientific universe. With the successful result of Dolly the World began to put the sky as the bound of possibility. However it is merely now in this modern age that we can come to understand what effects cloning could hold on World society. The subject of cloning is a cosmopolitan job nevertheless it is besides an incredible human discovery. Aspects such as moral issues, ethical issues and the overall consequence of cloning set up uncertainties and positive feelings for this universe phenomenon. The procedures that were used to clone the first of all time genetically engineered sheep # 8220 ; Dolly # 8221 ; was a hard procedure. # 8220 ; Dolly # 8217 ; s # 8221 ; discovery was the first ever-successful ringer utilizing an grownup sheep cell. The first measure was roll uping some bodily organic structure cells from the sheep. These cells are the cells that are the first measure to cloning. Unfertilized eggs are than collected from a Ewe. Using carefully calculated information sections of Deoxyribonucleic acid are removed from the egg cells. After this procedure one of the original bodily cells is placed into the cardinal yolk of the unfertilised egg. Using chemical and electrical stimulations the freshly formed embryo is made to make it # 8217 ; s ain fertilisation. This embryo is so developed in a civilization. The embryo develops and signifiers in a civilization that sustains needful foods for the embryo to last. Once a sufficient civilization is developed the embryo is implanted into a replacement female parent. A new sheep is so born through this fantastic technique of cloning. Using the method of cl oning, scientists are able to take specific cistrons and features in different animate beings to make the perfect specimen. Many people believe that Cloning is incorrect, nevertheless many people believe that Cloning is a necessity for universe endurance. It is difficult to find whether or non the advantages of cloning are more of import than the disadvantages. Cloning opened the universe to an limitless ere of Advantages. From nutrients to worlds, cloning could set up tremendously good results. Take cloning Dolly the sheep for an illustration, you could make an limitless supply of # 8220 ; Dolly # 8221 ; sheeps, this would make a figure of advantages. Imagine that if the specimen of Dolly was in menace of going nonextant, good cloning could get the better of this scenario. Through cloning a big figure of # 8220 ; Dolly # 8221 ; sheep extinction would be about impossible. This would let a fantastic species such as # 8216 ; Dolly # 8221 ; to be viewed for coevalss. Some negativ e facets of cloning nevertheless would originate. First there is a high cost factor involved in cloning and therefore tremendous fiscal backup is required. Second indistinguishable familial information could ensue in a major epidem Intelligence Community. Speciess with the same familial information could wholly be killed with one virus. One other consideration is for the animate beings. It would be barbarous and morally incorrect to make a production line of indistinguishable animate beings. Starving states would no longer hold to populate through hungriness and hurting. Cloned animate beings and works life could provide the hapless states with an limitless sum of right foods and minerals. Imagine a universe without famishment? Well Cloning has the possible to supply a luxury such as this. Disease is besides presently blighting metropoliss across the full universe, killing 1000000s of people each twelvemonth. With the assistance of Cloning disease could be wiped from being. Scientists could bit by bit outbreed disease by cloning those people who have perfect immune systems and were free from any disease. Another method would be to change cistrons in worlds so that diseases have no consequence. This would be a great advantage to communities throughout the universe. Although these are all positive results of cloning, there are a big figure of negative facets to closely look at. Disease would be a fantastic portion of life to pass over out. However many ethical and spiritual questions need to be putt frontward. What would go on to our Earth if everyone lived an excess 20 old ages? Well possibly there is a ground that we have things such as famishment and disease in our universe. The quest for additions in human life span and animate beings could endorse fire and have lay waste toing effects on the universe. The strive for flawlessness could take to living conditions going progressively worse. Farmers would observe at the idea of cloning limitless sums of animate beings, fruits and veggies. Production would finally be cheaper therefore economic benefits would billow. Merchandises could be cloned to organize the biggest and juiciest apples, the longest and tastiest Cucumis sativuss and sheep with the softest and thickest wool. Not merely would at that place be an limitless sum of resource but the quality of resource would be the best that the universe has of all time experienced. However a negative side to this would be that big farms would shortly set up a big proportion of market portion and would therefore strike hard out of the market smaller farms. One of the major dangers of cloning is the extent that scientists throughout the universe will persue the discovery. Soon scientists could experiment with cloning full worlds and this would do many ethical and spiritual jobs. It is believed that person, someplace creates every populating thing different on Earth. So the inquiry of why alteration nature? Beckons to be answered. Well, before any farther production of cloning should travel in front I believe that limitations and guidelines should be established. However what could halt person from cloning a human today? Possibly they already hold? Well these are some of the limitless inquiries that need to be answered before we should come on further into the scientific universe of Cloning. Possibly we are get downing and stop to civilization? No 1 truly knows

The Metamorphosis by F. Kafka an Example of the Topic Literature Essays by

The Metamorphosis by F. Kafka Franz Kafka belongs to those writers of the twentieth century whose fiction express sorrow over the fracturing of the human community. His well-developed, modernist parables often do not have any fixed meaning, yet they reflect the insecurities of age when faith in old-established beliefs has crumbled. Kafka masterfully combines within one framework the knowable and mysterious, an exact portrayal of the actual world with a dreamlike and magical dissolution of it. The analysis of one of his works will allow seeing in what way Kafka attains that profound quality of his expression of the experience of human loss, estrangement, and guilt - an experience increasingly dominant in the modern age. Kafkas best-known story The Metamorphosis is the illustrative work in which the realism of commonplace detail clashes with not improbable but absurd turns of events. Need essay sample on "The Metamorphosis by F. Kafka" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed The inner world of Kafkas character passes through the imaginable world into actual one. Gregor Samsa in The Metamorphosis transforms into an insect as the only way to manifest his insect-like relationship to the world, where he lives. The Metamorphosis is peculiar as a narrative in having its climax in the very first sentence: As Gregor Samsa awoke one morning from uneasy dreams, he found himself transformed in his bed into a gigantic insect. (Kafka, 19) The rest of the story drifts down from this high point of astonishment as one great revelation of truth. This form of narrative, which contradicts all conventional concepts of presenting the discourse, violates the rules just the same as the peoples faith in particular ancient beliefs had been violated in the twentieth century. His story is about death, but death is not dnouement of the story, as it is not the most horrible event in the life of the character. The first sentence of The Metamorphosis announces Gregor Samsas death, and the rest of the story is his slow death. For a moment, near the end of his long dead, while listening to his sister play the violin, he feels as if the way were opening before him to the unknown nourishment he craved (Kafka, 76); but he could not get out of his room-cell, and he expires. University Students Frequently Tell EssayLab specialists: Who wants to write assignment for me? Essay writer professionals advise: Get Help In Writing An Essay Essay Helper Students Best Essay Writing Service Review Top Essay Writing Best Essay Writing Service What Gregor awakens to on the morning of his metamorphosis is the truth of his life. That dreadful dream, which he got into, reveals, in fact, reality, which he could not have understood before - he is a vermin, a disgusting creature shut out from the human circle. (Kafka, 33) Kafka prefers to use a metaphor so that Gregor Samsa is not like a vermin, but he is vermin. This metamorphosis is indeed no dream but a revelation of the truth. In giving up all hope of reentering the human circle, Gregor finally understands the truth about his life; and as he accepts this truth, he begins to sense a possibility that exists for him only in his outcast state. He is hungry enough, he realizes, but not for the worlds stuff, not for that kind of food. (Kafka, 74) This truth is composed of an array of facts. First of all, he grasps the deteriorative effect of his job upon his soul, the position that materially supports him but cuts him off from the possibility of real human associations. He has been sacrificing himself by working at his meaningless, degrading job to pay off an old debt of his parents to his employer. Otherwise Id have given notice long ago, Id have gone to the chief and told him exactly what I think of him. (Kafka, 21) Another truth revealed through metamorphosis is the situation in the Samsa family: on the surface, the official sentiments of the parents and the sister toward Gregor, and of Gregor toward them and himself; underneath, the horror and disgust, and self-disgust: ... family duty required the suppression of disgust and the exercise of patience, nothing but patience. (Kafka, 65) His metamorphosis is a judgment on himself from the standpoint of his defeated humanity. Creating in The Metamorphosis a character who is real and unreal, that contains specific meaning but is deprived of self, Kafka encourages his readers to fill in the void that exists at the center of the insect-Gregors self. Thus, as a reader, one can conclude that Gregors metamorphosis is a symbol of his alienation from the human state, of his awakening to the full horror of his dull, spiritless existence, and of the desperate self-disgust of his unconscious life. Works Cited List: Kafka, Franz (1952) Selected Short Stories of Franz Kafka. Translators Edwin Muir, Willa Muir New York: Modern Library, 1952